Former Harvard University professor Jorge Dominguez served as the chair of the Harvard Academy for International and Area Studies. Over the course of his academic career, Dr. Jorge Dominguez authored several publications on Cuba, its communist politics, and its relations with the United States.
On January 1, 2019, Cuba celebrated the 60th anniversary of the communist revolution spearheaded by the late former president Fidel Castro. In commemoration, 87-year-old Raul Castro, the brother of Fidel and the first secretary of the ruling Communist Party, delivered an address to the Cuban people and the world in which he reiterated Cuba’s openness to diplomatic engagement while criticizing the resurgence of confrontation by Washington. He particularly cited the current US administration’s dissemination of “falsehoods” to discredit Cuba and blame it for various ills in the region.
Dressed in full military attire, Raul Castro highlighted how, over the 60 years, Cuba had shown that it would not be cowed by threats. He followed by reiterating the island nation’s commitment to peaceful co-existence and its openness to economically beneficial trade. The widely publicized address was given at Santiago de Cuba, the burial site of Fidel Castro.
A former Harvard professor focused on Latin American studies, Jorge Dominguez has published several books that explore Cuba’s political and economic landscapes. On June 27, 2017, Jorge Dominguez published an op-ed in the New York Times that discussed America’s relations with Cuba in the aftermath of Donald Trump’s June 16 speech in Miami in which he announced the cancellation of former President Obama’s deals with Cuba.
As of the date of publication of the op-ed, many of the previous US administration’s policies toward Cuba were still in effect, despite Trump’s assertions that he had canceled all deals made between former President Obama and Cuba. In fact, Trump had even ratified some of those policies, including military cooperation between the two states along Guantanamo’s perimeter, air and sea collaboration against drug trafficking, and security cooperation to halt undocumented migration. On the economic front, the United States’ commercial flights to Cuba were still in operation, and agricultural exports to Cuba were still flowing, as were financial remittances from the US to Cuba.
The reason for this? According to the US Treasury, the changes announced by Trump could take effect only when new regulations were issued. The White House later said that the issuance of new regulations could take months, which ensured that the status quo remains. As it stands, Trump’s reluctance to reopen bilateral negotiations and political debate over US-Cuba policy, despite his strong rhetoric, implies an openness to maintaining US-Cuba relations as they are.
Most recently serving as Harvard University’s Department of Government Antonio Madero Professor for the Study of Mexico, emeritus, Jorge Dominguez focused on Latin America. Jorge Dominguez recently edited The Cuban Economy in a New Era: An Agenda for Change Toward Durable Development and was interviewed in-depth by Readara on the subject.
With Cuba under president Miguel Diaz-Canel having made moves to increase foreign direct investment (FDI) and authorize private businesses in some areas of the economy, there are still major challenges. Beyond the inherent inefficiencies of most of Cuba’s state run sectors, there are no officially sanctioned wholesale markets or international supply chains for imported products, which would allow critical supplies to be accessed at competitive prices.
As Professor Dominguez describes it, ordinary people must do “crazy and illegal stuff” to access needed supplies. The government on some level recognizes the necessity of this, as tourism is a positive area in the Cuban economy that would be hurt if those entrepreneurs who do access supplies illegally were shut down.
If the system whereby private restaurants are allowed to operate within the law was extended to other parts of the Cuban economy “it would make a great deal of sense.” Unfortunately, there is a lingering fear among the leadership that things might get out of control and their primacy would be threatened by U.S. government pressure.